From d7136ff201c331ff0daec1f4e82993013c3fcfd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: lindaleist236 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 03:52:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role --- ...And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md | 64 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md diff --git a/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md b/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dbc7c2d --- /dev/null +++ b/Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities%27 All-important Role.-.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig)
The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited [sports betting](https://www.social.united-tuesday.org/read-blog/19461_how-to-attract-users-to-my-fantasy-sports-platform.html).
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
No, they weren't personally in attendance, but the world-famous celebrities were notably included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial websites providing both complimentary casino-style video games and financially rewarding prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by lawsuits. In the eyes of lots of gaming corporations, not to mention lawsuit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as conventional casinos, just without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.
+
One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits in 2015 alone. Now the [business](https://social.oneworldonesai.com/read-blog/1754_how-much-are-americans-spending-on-sports-betting.html) faces allegations of illegal gambling in a New York lawsuit that claims VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'create a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's statement below)
+
'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.
+
Sweepstakes endorsers include a series of celebrities from [sports betting](https://wiki.vifm.info/index.php/User:Jimmy50739) enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars [Karl-Anthony](https://mediawiki1263.00web.net/index.php/User:BradyMark7106348) Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any distinctions between conventional gambling and sweepstakes play.
+
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online
+
Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - games are free
+
Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he routinely touts on social networks
+
Learn more
+
Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'
+
Instead, ads usually focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while omitting the capacity for actual [sports betting](https://sportstalkhub.com/read-blog/20356_compare-amp-review-oddsjet-de.html) losses.
+
Others lure consumers with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad flaunting Drake's vehicles, airplanes and mansions before rotating to video footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.
+
'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the very first caption on the screen.
+
Another caption discussed: 'Because I never quit.'
+
The inconsistency between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, but [operators](https://wavedream.wiki/index.php/User:PatriciaLindrum) of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.
+
A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for free.
+
'Most social sweeps consumers never ever buy,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or bet size at real-money online [sports betting](https://kenyansocial.com/read-blog/1326_sweepstakes-casino-controversy-and-celebrities-039-all-important-role.html) websites.'
+
Social casinos offer customers a chance to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase worthless currency often described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for genuine money, however can be used to open [numerous functions](https://infinirealm.com/read-blog/8247_enhance-your-business-opportunities-with-efficient-sports-apps.html) within the games.
+
But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling clients to get other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other prizes.
+
And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on [sweepstakes casinos](https://rhabits.io/read-blog/7328_online-betting-firms-gamble-on-soccer-mad-nigeria.html) in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.
+
The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion
+
Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's vehicles, airplanes and mansions
+
Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker
+
Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but seven states, which has helped to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.
+
Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don't need usually need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to submit mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular instructions. What's more, gamers are typically rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, therefore providing a factor to try their hands at any variety of [casino video](https://customerscomm.com/read-blog/3714_sports-minister-tracey-crouch-resigns-over-039-hold-up-039-to-betting-crackdown.html) games for a chance to win - or lose - genuine cash.
+
So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7?
+
According to the stakeholders, their product is the gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a means of promoting their support.
+
'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a type of online entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is required to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to pay for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an essential difference between social sweeps and traditional online [sports betting](https://www.athleticzoneforum.com/read-blog/753_sports-minister-tracey-crouch-resigns-over-039-hold-up-039-to-betting-crackdown.html) sites like gambling establishments.'
+
Think of the method that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and [french fries](https://pipewiki.org/wiki/index.php/User:SherryBosley47) that offer them the [possibility](https://social.japrime.id/read-blog/23444_the-history-of-the-nfl-and-how-to-bet-on-it.html) to win rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million prize.
+
And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself doesn't fulfill the meaning of gambling in the US.
+
'Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all sort of everyday businesses in the United States, everything from burgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'
+
But to lots of gambling industry experts, that argument does not cut it.
+
For beginners, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly video game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, thereby recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
+
'They don't last permanently and they're usually not connected to casino-style video games of possibility,[' Wallach](https://www.athleticzoneforum.com/read-blog/735_uk-betting-firms-gamble-on-united-states-after-sports-wager-ruling.html) told DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash free gifts.
+
'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities commonly connected with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments offer" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payout portion for a temporary marketing sweepstakes is a trivial share of the profits earned by the company [normally less than one percent]'
+
Wallach is quick to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet cafes that emerged in Florida, providing clients the possibility to play casino-style games for genuine rewards. A lot of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually considering that been shuttered over accusations of prohibited gambling.
+
DJ Khaled is among several celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand
+
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments must face similar analysis.
+
'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as crucial consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion [remained](https://younivix.com/read-blog/29934_start-winning-with-pcg-college-football-picks.html) in [reality](https://higgledy-piggledy.xyz/index.php/User:XHDKorey52) a guise for unlawful gambling.'
+
Among the casino industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
['Consumers](https://planetdump.com/read-blog/79_things-you-need-to-know-about-rafting-adventures.html) are being deprived of protections and states are passing up significant tax and profits chances as this [sports betting](https://letustalk.co.in/read-blog/11515_sports-minister-tracey-crouch-resigns-over-039-delay-039-to-betting-crackdown.html) changes that performed through managed channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.
+
And then there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a dozen states.
+
Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued litigation.
+
Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker
+
In the newest claim, which is largely similar to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'prohibited [sports betting](https://tartar.app/read-blog/1712_how-much-are-americans-spending-on-sports-betting.html) enterprise. '
+
Apple and Google have likewise been named as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.
+
'We usually do not comment on matters before the courts,' a [VGW spokesperson](https://app.theremoteinternship.com/read-blog/25815_uk-betting-firms-gamble-on-us-after-sports-wager-ruling.html) told [DailyMail](https://connectingsparks.com/read-blog/25122_why-every-cricket-fan-need-to-try-the-all-cricket-id-gaming-platform.html).com by means of email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.
+
'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and stay positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games across many of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, creating not only terrific games, user experiences and home entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done safely, properly and at the greatest level of requirements.
+
'More broadly, we 'd repeat that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are reasonably common throughout the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to intensely defend any claim which may be brought versus us.'
+
The concerns between standard online gambling and sweepstakes casinos might prove bothersome for some star endorsers.
+
Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and [DraftKings](https://palkwall.com/read-blog/27740_for-sports-gambling-to-be-legalised.html).
+
'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful [sports betting](https://kenyansocial.com/read-blog/1370_how-much-are-americans-spending-on-sports-betting.html) 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues desire to forecast a strong stance against illegal gambling - especially when trying to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.
+
It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, [Porter's scandal](http://video.firstkick.live/read-blog/4637_tennessee-sports-betting-top-4-legal-betting-sites-in-2024.html) is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.
+
In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably illegal [sports betting](https://www.buzzgate.net/read-blog/503_uk-betting-firms-gamble-on-us-after-sports-wager-ruling.html) sites
+
Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant concern for leagues such as the NBA.
+
'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing [sweepstakes sites](https://origintraffic.com/read-blog/1698_sweepstakes-casino-controversy-and-celebrities-039-all-important-role.html) is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.
+
Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers' agents reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also neglected to react to DailyMail.com emails.
+
Asked if their star endorsers have a duty to describe to clients the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.
+
'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our service practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our values are" our gamers precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'
+
Glaser, an [outspoken opponent](https://wavedream.wiki/index.php/User:LindseyColon) of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) +
'Celebrities who lend their names to dubious illegal gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk along with courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state chief law officers rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful [sports betting](https://jimsusefultools.com/index.php/User:LisaCastanon2).'
+
New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
[bet9ja.com](https://register.bet9ja.com/?btag=yohaig&promocode=yohaig) \ No newline at end of file